In the midst of two GPU juggernauts hyping up their new releases, a less prominent name in the field is attempting to enter the fray. Intel hopes to finally be competitive in the GPU market with its Intel Arc Alchemist lineup.
The rivalry between AMD and NVIDIA is heating up again after years of NVIDIA dominance. However, things appear to be on far more equal footing following the releases of their next-gen graphics cards.
All of this provides a perfect storm for Intel to enter the market.
Let’s get started!
- October 5, 2022: Reworked entire article, added benchmarks for A770 and A750, updated specifications, and more.
- September 20, 2022: Added news on Intel Arc Alchemist release date.
- September 6, 2022: Minor updates.
- August 24, 2022: Added positive news regarding Intel’s Arc driver status, pricing updates, and A580 performance leaks.
- August 16, 2022: Added new price estimates and the future of Intel Arc.
- August 11, 2022: Added new benchmarks and more news about the future of Intel’s desktop GPUs.
- August 6, 2022: Added news about the possibility that Intel might scrap the entire lineup.
- July 22, 2022: Removed plenty of outdated information and added new pricing, release date, and performance information.
- July 15, 2022: Added video with Intel’s engineer explaining everything behind the Intel Arc architecture
- July 12, 2022: Added a bunch of new information, benchmarks, and performance comparisons.
- June 24, 2022: Added third-party benchmarks for the Intel Arc A380.
- June 20, 2022: Added new information on Resizable BAR and cleaned up article.
- June 14, 2022: Added performance leaks for the A380.
- May 27, 2022: Added new release date rumors.
- May 11, 2022: Added another rumored delay for Intel’s desktop GPUs.
- May 4, 2022: Cut down on outdated leaks, added a release date, and pricing information.
- April 22, 2022: Added three new SKUs, updated specifications, added A770 leaks and more.
- April 12, 2022: Added benchmark images of the A350M in-game.
- April 1, 2022: Revamped the entire article following Intel’s announcements and added a lot more content.
- March 30, 2022: Added Arc mobile GPU specifications table.
- March 24, 2022: Another update on the release date.
- March 15, 2022: Added Intel Arc Event announcement, release date information, and performance rumors.
- February 22, 2022: Added new Geekbench leaks.
- January 31, 2022: Cleaned up the article and added A370M leaks.
- January 25, 2022: Added Intel Arc flagship benchmark leak and specification information for mobile SKUs.
- January 13, 2022: Updated release date information.
- December 22, 2021: Added new benchmark leak from Ashes of the Singularity.
- December 14, 2021: Added information about possible release date delay and about the flagship GPU die size.
- December 6, 2021: Added table for possible SKU configurations.
- November 29, 2021: Added a bit more information on future Intel Arc generations.
- November 22, 2021: Added new benchmark leak of the 512 EU SKU.
- November 16, 2021: Further grammar optimizations.
- November 15, 2021: Added new Intel Arc Alchemist GPU and PCB images.
- November 11, 2021: Added a few additional images.
- November 3, 2021: Major rework of the article. Updated or removed outdated information.
- October 28, 2021: Removed outdated information and leaks.
- October 18, 2021: Added interview with Pat Gelsinger and their role in the dedicated GPU market.
- October 12, 2021: Added information regarding Intel’s new GPU architecture and Intel Xe IP vice president.
- September 28, 2021: Added information on Intel’s dGPU history.
- September 20, 2021: Fixed a few information-related errors.
- September 2, 2021: Added new official information from Intel about Alchemist architecture.
- August 3, 2021: Added new benchmark score of the 128 EU SKU
- June 23, 2021: Added a new leak of a Xe SKU compared to the RTX 3070 and RX 6700 XT.
- May 25, 2021: Added information regarding the fact that Intel Xe DG1 would appear in pre-built systems.
- April 7, 2021: Added a few more leaks.
- March 5, 2021: Added leaks of a DG2 Discrete GPU in use by Intel.
Table of ContentsShow
Originally, Intel was supposed to release the Arc Alchemist GPUs quite a bit sooner, but because of numerous GPU or management-related issues, the graphics cards were delayed numerous times.
But, finally, Arc Alchemist is nearing its release.
The Intel Arc A750 and Arc A770 will release on October 12th. Furthermore, the review embargo is already lifted, so we have some third-party benchmarks to share with you!
Although it is important to note
The rest of the lineup is still in the dark, with the exception of the Arc A380, which was released on August 16th.
If you are not interested in this generation of Intel Arc Alchemist GPUs, hold out for future generations of Intel Arc like Battlemage, Celestial, or Druid.
Since the original announcement of Intel’s desktop GPUs, Intel’s idea was to offer the most competitive pricing on the market, and it seems they succeeded.
Here’s the price list, but do note that certain GPU MSRPs are subject to change once they release:
- A310 – <$100?
- A380 – $139
- A580 – $220
- A750 – $289
- A770 8GB – $329
- A770 16GB – $349
With the initial release of the low-end Arc A380, the future for Intel’s Arc Alchemist lineup looked pretty grim.
However, after the review embargo, we can see that Intel provides proper performance at a good price point.
But, before well look at third-party benchmarks, let’s talk about the underlying issues.
Steve from Gamers Nexus mentions multiple driver problems while reviewing the Arc A750 and A770 GPUs.
This included games crashing or not running, including Fortnite, Valorant, Battlefield 2042, Spider-Man Remastered, and more.
Furthermore, Gamers Nexus also had issues with monitors not detecting the card, or in other words, no display. Fan control is also absent, but it may be added on the release day or in the future.
Either way, these are not issues that can be fixed within a short amount of time, so early buyers will definitely have trouble with Intel’s Arc GPUs.
With that out of the day, let’s see how Intel Arc GPUs perform (when they actually work.)
High-End Desktop SKUs
While the low-end A380 has provided disappointing results, Intel’s Arc high-end shows promise.
To start on a good note, here’s a Gamers Nexus chart of Strange Brigade (in Vulkan) in which the Arc A770 performs quite well against its competitors.
The 16GB A770 is about 25% faster than the RTX 3060 and about 7% slower than the RTX 3070. For a $349 card, those are some impressive numbers.
If the Intel ARC lineup performs as well in every game as in Strange Brigade, this entire article would be a different story. Unfortunately, that is not the case.
Here’s the proof:
In both F1 2022 and Tomb Raider, the Arc A770 is considerably slower than the AMD RX 6600, a card that’s available for around $250 nowadays. Already that’s a huge disadvantage for Intel.
It might be worth mentioning that at higher resolutions than 1080p (1440p or 4K), Intel’s GPUs perform a lot better, surpassing the RX 6600 XT and RTX 3060.
In older competitive games like Rainbow Six Siege and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, FPS is abysmal, to say the least.
Intel did mention its three-tier gaming strategy (we’ll delve deeper into that later) and its worse performance with DX9 games, but CS: GO is one of the most played games in the world, so is this kind of performance acceptable?
So, the $350 16GB Arc A770 isn’t looking too good, so let’s see if the cheaper A750 proves worthier.
In most video games, it seems the A770 is only about 5% faster than the cheaper A750. So, is it really worth paying 20% extra for such a small increase in performance and plus 8GB of VRAM?
In Watch Dogs: Legion, we see some good results for the A750. It outperforms the RTX 3060 and nears the RTX 3060 Ti, but is still quite a bit behind the RX 6600 XT.
However, by increasing the resolution to 1440p, both Arc GPUs get a bump in performance.
Finally, here’s a 12-game average in 1080p and 1440p to give you a good idea of what to expect from Intel’s new desktop cards:
At 1080p, the A770 does not offer any kind of good value, considering the RX 6600 is substantially cheaper (~$240) while the RX 6600 XT is available for around $320.
The A750 is better as a 1080p card, but the RX 6600 is still faster and cheaper, so a bad deal overall.
In 1440p, though, both cards push a little bit higher on the chart. The A770 is about 3% slower than the RX 6650 XT, while the A750 is around 6% faster than the RX 6600.
Mid-Range GPU – A580
The A580 will be Intel’s mid-range and possibly the best price-per-performance GPU.
We barely have any information for this SKU, but recently an Ashes Of The Singularity benchmark leaked, so we can use that as insight.
According to VideoCardz, the RTX 3060 scores anywhere between 75 to 96 FPS in this same (Vulkan) benchmark, so performance with the A580 is pretty similar.
Keep in mind, though, the A580 isn’t an RTX 3060 competitor, so take this leak with a bit of salt.
Low-End – A380
The A380 is the first desktop GPU to release from the Intel ARC lineup, which is a complete letdown in almost all aspects.
The RX 6400 comes out on top by more than 10%. It’s not a huge difference in performance, but when you consider that this is a brand new architecture and a price point of ~$140.
Currently, Intel’s low-end GPUs are not very appealing, especially after you consider the awful performance in older titles (CS: GO, Rainbow Six Siege, etc.)
Intel’s Three Tier Gaming Strategy
The reason why we’ve seen such bad performance in games that use older APIs like DX9 and DX11 is that Intel has a “Three Tier Game Strategy” in place.
They will be splitting games into three different tiers, and here’s how that split will look:
- Tier I: Games that have support for the latest APIs and are optimized for Intel’s Arc architecture. So, newer games like Cyberpunk 2077, Tomb Raider, Call of Duty, etc. This is where Intel will offer the best price/performance.
- Tier II: Games with DirectX12 and Vulkan, but without optimizations for Intel Arc GPUs.
- Tier III: Videos games on older APIs will run worse on Intel Arc GPUs compared to AMD’s and Nvidia’s graphics cards in the same price range.
There are definitely bad and good sides to this. If you consistently play the latest titles, you will most likely have great performance when compared to AMD or NVIDIA.
However, if you are a person that enjoys older titles, understand that an Intel Arc GPU may not perform as well as you would like.
Specifications And Features
With the Intel Arc A770, A750 and A380 released, we already have a good idea of their performance.
But, let’s look at some specifications and, more importantly, unique features.
|SKU/GPU Name||Xe Cores||Shading Units||Clock Speed||Memory||Memory Bus||TBP|
|Arc A770 16GB||32||4096||2100 MHz||16GB GDDR6||256-bit||225W|
|Arc A770 8GB||32||4096||2100 MHz||8GB GDDR6||256-bit||225W|
|Arc A750||28||3072||2050 MHz||8GB GDDR6||256-bit||225W|
|Arc A580||16?||2048?||?||8GB? GDDR6||128-bit?||~150-200W?|
|Arc A380||8||1024||2000MHz||6GB GDDR6||96-bit||75W|
|Arc A310||6||?||2000MHz||4GB GDDR6||64-bit||75W|
Currently, the A550 still has not been announced or any other Arc 5-series GPU. The A310 was announced, but still no exact release date.
Resizable BAR (Intel and Nvidia) or Smart Access Memory (Ryzen+Radeon) has been a thing for a few years now. It’s a reintroduced feature that allows for better communication between the CPU and the GPU.
Weirdly enough, in Intel’s Arc quick start guide for desktop SKUs, Intel specifies that Resizable BAR is a must-have for the best possible performance out of this new generation of GPUs.
However, ReBAR is available only on Intel’s 10th, 11th, and 12th generation CPUs. Does this mean that Intel Arc GPUs won’t perform as well on older Intel platforms or on AMD CPUs?
This is yet to be tested by reviewers.
Intel introduced us to its new desktop GPU architecture and goals with Intel’s Architecture Day 2021.
After an almost never-ending silence (or more) on Intel Arc, we got information on Arc alchemist. Specifically, Intel’s compute building block, Xe-Core. The Xe-Core is a direct replacement for Intel’s Execution units (EUs).
Every Xe-core includes 16 Vector Engines (VE) and 16 Matrix Engines (XMX). Each of those Vector Engines processes 256 bits per cycle. Based on Intel’s explanation, each VE has 8 ALUs. That leads to a total of 128 ALUs in one Xe-Core. The core also has its L1 cache.
Intel combines four of these cores to create a Render Slice. We’ve now jumped up to 512 ALUs and 64 XMX.
Furthermore, there are four Ray Tracing Units in each Render Slice to help with ray tracing performance. There are also Samplers, Pixel Backends, and engines for Geometry, Rasterization, and HiZ.
However, Intel had to scale it further to see the true potential of these cores and Render Slices. Thus their flagship GPU holds eight Render Slices. That means 32 Xe-Cores, 512 Vector and Matrix Engines, and a total of 4096 ALUs.
Here’s a Gamers Nexus video with Intel’s Graphics Engineer Tom Petersen explaining the engineering behind the Arc GPUs:
Intel XeSS Upscaling
Those Matrix Engines perform a role similar to NVIDIA’s Tensor Cores which use to accelerate AI-related workloads. Because of this DLSS 2.0 is so successful at supersampling.
Intel’s XeSS upscaling can utilize XMX to provide just similar upscaling to DLSS. But, until we see real third-party comparisons, we can’t really say.
Until then, here’s an upscaled 4K demo powered by Intel Arc GPU.
As seen in the demo above, XeSS rendered at 4K looks identical and sometimes even better than 4K native while providing up to 2x the FPS. At least, that’s what Intel claims.
With the A350M and A370M releases, Intel will provide XeSS support for a dozen games, including Hitman 3, Chivalry II, Ghostwire Tokyo, Death Stranding, Anvil, Dolmen, Tomb Raider, and more.
Supposedly, Intel XeSS technology may work with NVIDIA and AMD GPUs.
Intel Deep Link, AV1 Encoding, And Arc Control
Another interesting new feature from Intel is the full support for AV1 encoding and decoding. That’s something that neither Nvidia nor AMD have, so that’s a big plus for content creators.
Combine the speed of AV1 encoding (already faster than standard HEVC encoding) with Intel’s new Deep Link technology that helps the CPU and GPU share power/resources, which leads to even faster encoding performance.
AV1 encoding might be one of the only good sides of Intel Arc GPUs, mostly because it is open source and performs better than NVIDIA’s NVENC and H.264 encoders.
EposVox uses Netflix’s VMAF, a video quality benchmark, to determine which video coding delivers the best possible viewing experience.
Looking at this chart, it is pretty obvious that Intel’s AV1 encoder is miles better than Nvidia or AMD. At 3500 kbps bitrate, it has an 83 VMAF score compared to NVENC, which scored only 71.
At a higher bitrate, the gap in video quality between these encoders gets smaller, but Intel’s AV1 is still the best out of the bunch.
Either way, streamers can use a low 3.5 MB/s bitrate and still offer video quality comparable to NVENC at 8.0 MB/s
Paired with these new features will be Intel’s new Arc Control software which can be used for recording, updating drivers, tweaking game settings, and more. It will have a role similar to GeForce Experience and AMD’s Radeon Software.
Intel Arc Alchemist Mobile
While most of this guide focuses on Intel’s desktop releases because that’s what most people have been waiting for, we can’t ignore the fact that Alchemist will show up on laptops too.
Here’s a table for a bit more specifications.
|Ray Tracing Units||6||8||16||24||32|
|GPU Clock||1150 MHz||1550 MHz||900 MHz||1100 MHz||1650 MHz|
|Memory Bus Width||64-bit||64-bit||128-bit||192-bit||256-bit|
VideoCardz’s original leaks have an exact match with these specifications shared on Intel’s Arc Event.
So, the A770M, the flagship GPU, gets 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM and a power of up to 150W, allowing a GPU clock of 1650MHz. The weaker A730M clocks quite a bit lower and gets 12GB VRAM.
The mid-range A550M comes with 8GB VRAM with a 1600MHz boost clock.
The little brothers, the A350M and A370M, both come with 4GB of VRAM and clocked at 1150MHz and 1550MHz, respectively.
We might not be witnessing a full-on three-way war between Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA, but something exciting is brewing. As gamers and tech enthusiasts, we can’t wait to see it.
Mobile GPU Performance
Both the A730M and A770M come in Alder Lake CPUs, while the RTX 3050 Ti and RTX 3060 are paired with Intel’s 11th-Gen CPUs.
So, here’s the comparison, but make sure you take it with a bit of salt:
|Games||RTX 3050 Ti||Arc A730M||RTX 3060||Arc A770M||A730M vs 3050 Ti||A770M vs 3060|
|Assassin's Creed Valhalla @ High||38||50||74||69||132%||93%|
|Borderlands 3 (Ultra)||45||50||60||76||111%||127%|
|Cyberpunk 2077 (Ultra)||39||49||54||68||126%||126%|
|Death Stranding (Ultra)||89||87||113||102||98%||90%|
|Dirt 5 (High)||64||61||83||87||95%||105%|
|F1 2021 (Ultra)||68||86||96||123||126%||128%|
|Far Cry 6 (Ultra)||63||68||80||82||108%||103%|
|Gears of War 5 (Ultra)||58||62||72||73||90%||101%|
|Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultimate Quality)||63||50||80||68||79%||85%|
|Metro Exodus (Ultra)||39||54||53||69||138%||130%|
|Red Dead Redemption 2 (High)||46||60||66||77||130%||117%|
|Strange Brigade (Ultra)||98||123||134||172||126%||128%|
|The Division 2 (Ultra)||63||51||78||86||81%||110%|
|The Witcher 3 (Ultra)||96||101||124||141||105%||114%|
|Total War Saga: Troy (Ultra)||48||66||71||86||138%||121%|
|Watch Dogs Legion (High)||59||71||77||89||120%||116%|
|17-Game Geometric Mean||57,2||64,6||78,8||88,3||113%||112%|
This is a solid variety of games, including both Nvidia and AMD optimized titles.
Based on Intel, the A730M outperforms the RTX 3050 Ti in almost all games, resulting in 13% more FPS. Notable gains over the 3050 Ti are in Metro Exodus, Control, and Total War Saga: Troy.
The A770M is supposedly 12% faster than the notebook RTX 3060. Overall, this entire table of numbers favors Intel’s Arc lineup, but can we really trust it? Also, we have to consider the cost of the laptops to get the full picture.
The recent leaks from 3dMark match these benchmarks.
The A770M scored 13244 points in Fire Strike Extreme, while the mobile RTX 3070 scored around 14000.
But is that really enough? Is all of this hype just for Intel Arc’s flagship to end up slower than Nvidia’s mid-end RTX 3070?
Here is also the lower mid-end Arc A550M in a Time Spy benchmark:
To put this into perspective, the RTX 3060 (notebook version) puts between 9000 and 10000 graphics score. It’s even slower than the RTX 3050.
For any future updates on Intel’s Arc desktop or mobile GPUs, make sure to check back on this article!