AMD RDNA 3 Release Date, Price, And Specs

2020 was an exciting time in both the PC and console worlds. We saw brand-new CPU and GPU releases from AMD and NVIDIA, but we also got the long-awaited next-gen consoles from Xbox and Sony.

These releases enjoyed significant performance improvements from their predecessors, generally thanks to the transition to a smaller (7nm) fabrication process from TSMC and Samsung.

To push the GPU technology folder, AMD based its RDNA 3 architecture on TSMC’s 5nm process. But is this new architecture enough to beat NVIDIA and satisfy customers?

Let’s see what RDNA 3 GPUs have to offer!

Related:NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4000 Series Release Date, Price, SpecsIntel Arc Alchemist Release Date, Price, Performance, Specs

Release Date

The two flagships RX 7000 Series GPUs, the RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT officially released for sale on December 13, 2022.

NVIDIA’s RTX 4080 and RTX 4070 Ti are the competitors of these two AMD flagship cards.

The RX 7600 was released on May 25, 2023.

However, both NVIDIA’s and AMD’s high-end cards are priced near $1,000 or over $1,000, so if you’re looking for better value GPUs, consider the mid-range RTX 4000 and RX 7000 cards.

If you want an RTX 4090 competitor, it might not happen because AMD’s EVP (Rick Bergman) and SVP (David Wang) disliked the idea of a power-hungry and inefficient flagship during an ITMedia interview.

However, AMD accidentally leaked a text file listing all of their current and upcoming graphics card, which includes an RX 7950 XTX, which does sound like an RTX 4090 equivalent.

We also see the RX 7800 XT, RX 7700 XT, RX 7600 XT, and RX 7500 XT, but no non-XT variants even though the RX 7600 is a non-XT GPU.

If RDNA 3 and RTX 4000 do not draw your interest, consider holding out for AMD’s RDNA 4 Series.

Price

Here is the official pricing for the RX 7000 GPUs:

• Radeon RX 7900 XTX – $999
• Radeon RX 7900 XT – $799 (old price – $899)
• Radeon RX 7800 XT – $699?
• Radeon RX 7700 XT – $599?
• Radeon RX 7600 – $269

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a direct competitor to the $1200 RTX 4080, but it is $200 cheaper. On the other hand, the Radeon RX 7900 XT, at $899 wasn’t very competitive considering the RTX 4070 Ti deputed at $800.

But, AMD officially cut the price of the RX 7900 XT to $800!

The RX 7600 at $270 seems like a lucrative offer, however, last-gen GPUs like the RX 6650XT are sold at the same prime while performing better. An awful offer as a new-gen GPU.

Architecture

Navi 3 or RDNA 3 GPUs have a chiplet design. The first ever gaming GPUs to have multiple chiplets fused into one. We’ve seen this same approach in AMD’s Ryzen processors which brought a lot of success to the company over the years.

The Navi 31 die has 1 GCD (Graphics Complex Die) graphics paired with 6 MCD (Multi-cache Die) which sums up to 96 CUs.

Thanks to those MCDs and second-generation Infinity Cache, AMD managed to boost the GPU’s peak bandwidth by 2.7X (up to 5.3 TB/s.)

Next-generation ray tracing accelerators are also added to the chip, so naturally, RX 7000 GPUs offer better ray tracing performance.

This new multi-die setup (and 5nm process node) allowed AMD to cram 165% more transistors-per-mm2.

Specifications

A new generation of the RDNA architecture on a 5nm fabrication process (from TSMC) is what makes the RX 7000 a solid upgrade over RX 6000.

The RDNA 3 architecture allows higher boost frequencies, more VRAM memory, higher bandwidth, and a lot more.

Here are the exact specifications of the RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT, in addition with rumored specifications for mid-range RX 7000 GPUs:

The RX 7900 XTX is AMD’s flagship with 96 CUs, a boost clock frequency of 2.5 GHz, a whopping 24GB of GDDR6 memory, and all of that at a total board power of 355W.

That’s a 15% increase in frequency over the RX 6950XT and a 20% increase in CUs (Compute Units.)

The flagship’s little brother, the RX 7900 XT is cut down to 84 CUs, 2.0 GHz game clock, 20GB GDDR6 VRAM, and maxed out power draw at 315W.

Another addition to the RDNA 3 lineup will be DisplayPort 2.1. With DP 2.1, users can get 8K@165Hz and 4K@480Hz. NVIDIA’s flagship RTX 4090 is still stuck with DP 1.4a which is limited to 8K@60Hz or 4K@120Hz.

The RX 7600 on the other hand doesn’t bring anything impressive compared to the RX 6600. It has 32 CUs, same as its predecessor, a 128-bit bus, 18 Gbps memory speed, and disappointing 8 gigabytes of VRAM.

Now, finally, let’s look at performance!

Performance

During AMD’s event, the company shared various slides, showing performance increases up to 1.7x compared to the RX 6950 XT.

However, companies like NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel like to nitpick the games to show their products in the best possible light.

Unfortunately, there seem to be some significant variances compared to third-party benchmarks.

Nevertheless, let’s first look at the performance of the 7900 XTX compared to current-gen and last-gen cards.

RX 7900 XTX

In most games, the RTX 4080 and RX 7900 XTX offer similar performance, while only a couple of games, including Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II favor AMD’s Radeon cards.

In Hardware Unboxed’s 16-game testing, the RX 7900 XTX is 3.5% faster than the RTX 4080 in 4K resolution. In 1440p, both cards offer practically the same performance. In 1080p, the Radeon GPU is just under 3% faster than the 4080.

Compared to last-gen, the RX 7900 XTX is 20% faster than the RX 6950 XT and 3090 Ti. So, the generational jump is significantly lower than the 1.7x claimed by AMD.

RX 7900 XT

For $900, the RX 7900 XT is naturally behind the RTX 4080 and its bigger brother, RX 7900 XTX.

In Hardware Unboxed’s testing, the RX 7900 XTX is 20% faster than the RX 7900 XT. This kind of performance difference makes the RX 7900 XT obsolete, considering that the flagship is only $100 more expensive.

It’s also only 10% faster than the RX 6950 XT.

Its performance and pricing leads to a much worse price-per-performance than the XTX.

RX 7600

I think that most people would agree when we say that the RX 7600 is a disappointment.

At 1080p, which is really the go-to resolution at this GPU tier, the RX 7600 is about 23% faster than the RX 6600.

This might seem like a good generational improvement, but the illusion is ruined by the almost as fast previous-gen RX 6650 XT, which is also priced very similarly to the RX 7600.

With just 8GB of VRAM, the GPU struggles in VRAM-demanding games like The Last of Us Part I, which is what makes this GPU a bad deal.

We recommend waiting for the upcoming $300 RTX 4060, which might perform better than the RX 7600, while you’ll also get other NVIDIA amenities like Frame Generation, Video Super Resolution, etc.

Ray Tracing Performance

With more capable GPUs, ray tracing acceleration, and upscaling technologies like FSR and DLSS, ray tracing is becoming much more usable and popular.

RDNA 3 comes with new ray-tracing accelerators, so here’s how that helps with in-game performance:

Unfortunately, even with the ray tracing accelerators, performance is still behind NVIDIA. The RTX 4080 is about 60% faster in Cyberpunk 2077 with ray tracing enabled and on Ultra than the RX 7900 XTX.

The gap reduces when you pair the Radeon cards with FSR upscaling vs. NVIDIA cards with DLSS.

The RX 7600 can’t really handle ray-tracing, so we won’t include it here.

Efficiency And Power Draw

AMD’s RDNA architecture brought huge efficiency improvements over the previous GCN architecture. Then, AMD achieved another monumental 50% performance-per-watt leap from RDNA 1 to RDNA 2.

Again, AMD claimed a 54% better performance-per-watt compared to RDNA 2.

Based on the testing done by Hilbert from Guru3D, performance-per-watt is doubled compared to the RX 6950 XT.

Although keep in mind that the RX 7900 XTX will still draw more power than the RTX 4080.

The RX 7600’s power efficiency is not too impressive either. It is better than the previous generation, but NVIDIA’s RTX 40 GPUs are definitely much more power efficient.

Based on this chart, the RX 7600 draws about 10% more power than the RX 6600 for 20-25% more performance.

Features

With RDNA 3 we are also getting a couple of new and updated technologies. Most notable are FSR 3.0 and Hypr-RX.

FSR 3.0

Supposedly, it can deliver up to two times more FPS compared to FSR 2. It won’t release until 2023 though. That’s all the information we got for now.

Of course, Radeon Super Resolution will also be available for RX 7000 users.

Now, this is where things get interesting.

Hypr-RX

AMD also announced a new technology named “Hypr-RX” which should also release in the first half of 2023. Hypr-RX should improve FPS and lower latency by a considerable amount.

When AMD first announced Hypr-RX, it seemed as though it was a brand new way to boost FPS, and we hoped it would be something similar to NVIDIA’s DLSS 3/Frame Generation.

However, it turns out that Hypr-RX is a feature that enables Radeon Super Resolution, Radeon Boost, and Radeon Anti-Lag with a single push of a button.

All of these features that are enabled with Hypr-RX are already part of Radeon Software, and you can enable them individually at any time.

Still, Hypr-RX will boost your FPS, so we can appreciate this kind of quality-of-life addition.

AMD claims that enabling Hypr-RX can boost performance by up to 85% in Dying Light 2.

Encoding And Decoding

With a new media engine, AMD has also improved media encoding, decoding, and stream transcoding, which has been a problem for AMD GPUs for years. NVIDIA’s NVENC was always miles ahead.

With AV1 coding, the quality of videos and streams is improved considerably.

EpoxVox tested AMD’s AV1 implementation with the RX 7900 XT, and from what we can see, the quality comes pretty close to NVIDIA.

Here’s the video so you can see for yourself:

Furthermore, AMD announces SmartAccess Video, which can be used to pair Ryzen and Radeon together for a 30% uplift in 4K multi-stream transcoding. This will probably introduce more uplifts in other similar workloads.

RDNA 3 In APUs And Mobile CPUs

RDNA 3 graphics cards will also be available in future Zen 4 mobile CPUs. During CES 2023, AMD announced its RX 7000 mobile lineup.

For now, there are only four GPUs, RX 7600M XT, RX 7600M, RX 7700S, and RX 7600S, but we might see more in the future.

AMD claims that the RX 7600 XT can even be faster than the desktop RTX 3060 in certain video game titles.

The chart above shows that the RX 7600M XT is 27% faster than RTX 3060 12GB in The Witcher 3. Not bad for a laptop GPU!

Compared to its predecessor, RX 6600M 8GB, it can be up to 30% faster in most games.

There is also the RX 7700S, but the specification, power draw, and performance seem to be identical to the RX 7600M XT, so we don’t really see the purpose of it.

It could be that the RX 7700S and RX 7600S are more suited for ultra-light/thinner laptops.

Performance-wise, the RX 7600S performs as fast as AMD’s previous S-variant flagship.

However, NVIDIA’s mobile RTX 4060 is about 5% faster than the RX 7600S when limited both are limited to 80W. When the 4060 is unlocked to 115W, it ends up about 25% faster than the AMD GPU.

That’s not the end of RDNA 3 though. AMD did mention way back that Zen 5 CPUs will be equipped with RDNA 3+ iGPUs.

Now, there are rumors circulating that the RDNA 3+ GPUs will have 8 WGPs clocked at 3 GHz+.

In single-die CPUs like the Ryzen 7045HS series, there’s the new Radeon 780M intergrated GPU.

It may not be comparable to the RX 7600M XT, but it will no doubt be the fastest integrated GPU, comparable to NVIDIA’s GTX 1650 Max-Q.

For now, that’s all there is to share on RDNA 3, but we’ll be sure to provide you with the necessary updates as soon as news is available!